Thursday, April 5, 2007
Blog # 9 Responding to McGowan
Reading the sentence given on our syyllabus doesn't do the actual sentence from the book's excerpt justice. I 100% agree with McGowan. Since the invention of the printing press, news getting to the masses has played an ever so important part in politics. I definitely agree with his claim that it has become a "propaganda organ of the state." I think if you look at that statement, it answers all of your questions. It truely is an organ. I think personally what McGowan meant by this was that to be an organ of something means to be a necessity. How could something function without its organ? I think that is why he chose that language because he's making a very important point; a dig if you will. He's saying that the state (the government) now (more than ever) needs the media. It is fueled by the media. However crooked and biased it may be. As I matter of fact, I think that the more crooked and biased it becomes, the happier the politicians. I think that if 100% neutralized news came out, (which I think would be impossible), people would be shocked by its contents. There are so many important, life threatening things out there that we don't know about, but it doesn't matter because if we at least know that 400 pound Bill Spencer is on "our side" at the end of the day. I mean look at my reaction the other day, everyone, including myself, were all laughing about my reaction to hearing all of this stuff. But it was genuine. I mean I think this could be the big one. I think that this is the one that could do us in. It's this type of dishonesty and corruption that is the silent killer. Why? Because people don't know about it. People know that our troops need to get out of Iraq; that's a widely known view. But, people don't know that every night, the television they sit in front of to gather the world's events isn't giving them the whole picture. Not saying everyone doesn't know, because I'm sure, some more well informed people do, however, I think that if that many people knew, they would be abandoning their viewing seats and heading to the streets right about now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I think if the news is 100% neutral, people would start to realize the flaws of the government and would cause some problems.
Having news be 100% neutral probably would cause problems and chaos. The world most definitely be in for a rude awakening.
"I think that if that many people knew, they would be abandoning their viewing seats and heading to the streets right about now."
Sadly, this is one spot where I'm more cynical than you are. (Blame the added years.) I'm not sure that people would do all that much to change the world, so long as they were comfortable. I don't like being this cynical, by the way. I don't recommend it.
Post a Comment